dragonrest.blogg.se -

Dxo photolab pixel edit mask update#
Dxo photolab pixel edit mask software#

Dxo photolab pixel edit mask update#

Update is worth it to me, pay up, if not wait a year and save moneyĭXO have expended a lot of effort on Fuji support and DAM this upgrade.

Dxo photolab pixel edit mask software#

It has been common practice with perpetual software to update every 2 years and I consider it a win win. Big improvement in DAM in V5, I don’t use a DAM. I would be a lot happier if a lot of those niggles had been addressed.Īll updates will appeal to different users. I am the type to pay for upgrades in some cases to show my support for a company I believe in, but while the Optics Modules and DeepPRIME are clearly ahead of the pack and most of the basics are perfectly serviceable, it seems like PL5 didn’t move the needle enough.

…I suspect there are more I’m forgetting.

Presets with newer sizing modes don’t have proper descriptions.

The DeepPRIME preview remains tiny despite updating much, much faster.

…which hasn’t changed at all (it needs a grab handle mode).

There’s no shortcut key for the horizon tool….

Watermarks still scale oddly in some situations.

Meanwhile, I’m noticing many of the little glitches and annoyances from PL4 remain. So out of four new features, one I could make good use of, one will be nice but not necessary, one is not up to the standard I need, and one is of zero use to me. I don’t own a Fuji camera and am unlikely to in the foreseeable future. But… I’ve said in these forums many times before that I usually just set an export going and walk off and leave my computer, so it’s really not a huge drawcard for me. And… the speed improvement on my Apple Silicon Mac is breathtaking.

Now… DeepPRIME was already astonishingly good so improvement in quality isn’t a big deal. (I have a well established workflow now which is seamless and simple.)Īs far as I can tell the improvement to DeepPRIME is only in speed. However I do use them quite a bit on other subjects and have frequently wished for more control.Īs discussed elsewhere, my chief concern with metadata is keywords and PL5 is still not close enough to my requirements, especially when LrC remains free to use for these features. I’m not a huge user of Local Adjustments, as I tend not to need them for much of my material - the aircraft shots. Improved U point control points and new control lines.According to the New Features page there are four.